Reviews for the new Michael biopic are out, and they have not been kind. But many critics seem so locked into their preconceived narratives about the King of Pop that they miss what is happening right in front of them.

At our screening, the audience loved this film. From the opening beats of the title sequence through the final concert performance, the room was electric. People were clapping, cheering, and audibly reacting throughout. By the end, they wanted more.

Jaafar Jackson as Michael Jackson in Michael. Photo Credit: Glen Wilson

That raises a real question. How does a critic dismiss a film that clearly connects with its audience? When viewers are engaged on that level, ignoring that reaction says more about the critic than the movie.

To understand Michael, you have to step back and consider the man at the center of it. Michael Jackson lived a life filled with both unprecedented success and relentless scrutiny. Yes, there was controversy. There always is at that level of fame. But he was also acquitted of the most serious allegations, yet still lived in a kind of exile, spending time in places like Ireland and Bahrain while remaining under constant media pressure. His life became a spectacle, one many would argue the media helped create.

The film approaches his story through the perspective of his family. It is told with affection by those closest to him, including his brothers and mother. That lens shapes everything you see on screen, for better or worse.

Directed by Antoine Fuqua and produced by Graham King, the force behind Bohemian Rhapsody, Michael leans heavily into performance over deep biographical analysis. That choice will divide critics, but it is also what makes the film work for audiences. This is not a courtroom drama or an investigative piece. It is a celebration of an artist.

Jaafar Jackson as Michael Jackson in Michael. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Lionsgate

Jaafar Jackson, the real-life son of Jermaine Jackson, takes on the title role, and his performance is nothing short of remarkable. There are moments where the resemblance is almost uncanny. I lost myself in the film more than once, feeling like I was watching Michael himself.

One standout moment comes during the recreation of the “Thriller” sequence. The attention to detail is extraordinary, from the choreography to the makeup. The production even filmed in the same street location as the original music video. It does not feel like imitation. It feels like time travel.

This is where the divide between critics and audiences becomes clear. Michael is a film made for fans. It is a love letter from a family to their brother, son, and uncle. It does not attempt to be definitive. Instead, it aims to remind viewers why Michael Jackson became the biggest global superstar the world has ever seen.

Jaafar Jackson as Michael Jackson in Michael. Photo Credit: Glen Wilson/Lionsgate

The film also touches on his upbringing, including the intense pressure placed on him by his father, Joseph Jackson. From a young age, Michael was immersed in rehearsals, touring, and a demanding environment that left little room for a normal childhood. The emotional isolation he experienced is a key thread throughout the film, helping explain the complexities of his adult life.

Colman Domingo as Joe Jackson in Michael. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Lionsgate

Coleman Domingo delivers a powerful performance as Joseph Jackson. He fully disappears into the role, portraying a figure who looms over the family with control and intensity. His presence is constant and, at times, unsettling.

Nia Long as Katherine Jackson in Michael. Photo Credit: Glen Wilson/Lionsgate

In contrast, Nia Long’s portrayal of Katherine Jackson brings warmth and quiet strength. She embodies a mother trying to protect her children while navigating an impossible situation. It is a performance that feels grounded and authentic, even if the film could have spent more time exploring her perspective.

Jaafar Jackson’s preparation for the role is evident in every scene. Reports suggest he spent nearly two years training with former choreographers and vocal coaches connected to Michael Jackson. That work pays off. His movements, voice, and overall presence feel natural rather than forced. This is not an impression. It is a transformation.

The filmmakers clearly understood what audiences want from a film like this. The musical performances are front and center, and they deliver. While the film may not dive as deeply into every chapter of Michael’s life as some critics would prefer, it captures the moments that defined his career and cultural impact.

Critics may argue that the film is too polished or too sympathetic. But that perspective overlooks the fact that this story is being told by the people who knew him best. It reflects their memories and their truth.

Judah Edwards as Young Tito, Jaylen Hunter as Young Marlon, Juliano Krue Valdi as Young MJ, Nathaniel McIntyre as Young Jackie and Jayden Harville as Young Jermaine in Michael. Photo Credit: Courtesy of Lionsgate

There are also glimpses into the realities of the music industry, though they are presented through a somewhat softened lens. Still, there are moments that stand out, including a sharp scene involving a record executive that highlights the power dynamics behind the scenes.

Where Michael truly succeeds is in reframing its subject. It pulls him away from decades of tabloid headlines and places him back into the context of his artistry and influence. For many viewers, especially those who grew up with his music, that shift is both refreshing and long overdue.

Yes, the film may feel like revisionist history at times. But it is also an insider’s perspective, something rarely seen at this scale. The performances, the music, and the energy all reflect the height of Michael Jackson’s career.

The film ends on a high note, stopping short of the darker chapters that may be explored in a likely sequel. That decision keeps the focus on his rise and legacy, leaving audiences with a sense of awe rather than controversy.

There is more of Michael’s story to tell, but this first installment is a strong and engaging start. It is entertaining, emotionally resonant, and never dull.

Most importantly, audiences are responding. At our screening, the reaction was undeniable. People were clapping, cheering, and fully invested from beginning to end.

That is something no review score can take away.